![]() Parkinson's Disease: (Banks & Martin, 2009 n = 339 with PD (164 male 179 female) mean age = 54.6 (range 27-75) Version 2 of SF-36 tested multiple configurations to determine recommended model for use and if this scale useful for PD. However, its psychometric properties in this population have not been specifically assessed (Nichol et al., 2011). The SF-12 is beginning to be more commonly used in the TBI population. The SF-12 is a shorter version of the SF-36 containing 12 items covers the summary physical health and mental health scales, but no information about each of the eight dimensions of the SF-36. Cut off scores are ≤ 72 and ≤ 60, respectively. The Mental Health Subscale of SF-36 (MHI-5) (VanLeeuwen et al., 2012) may be used in the future to determine mental health and severe mental health problems in persons with SCI. Postal administration of the SF-36 is not recommended (O'Mahony et al., 1998) Some disadvantaged populations, slight declines in reliability may result (Turner-Bowker et al., 2002) To document patient change (Dorman et al., 1999) Severely affected stroke survivors who require a proxy to complete the assessment Patients who cannot understand written or spoken language (2009) recommend that the SF-36 states “walkwheel” to improve responsiveness for patients with spinal cord injury. Physical function domain: significant floor effects for patients with SCI and other disabilities due to inability to perform some of the physical tasks described. Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N) Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)Īppropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N) Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N) Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research: Recommendations based on EDSS Classification: Recommendations for use based on ambulatory status after brain injury: Recommendations based on SCI AIS Classification: Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken: Recommendations Based on Parkinson Disease Hoehn and Yahr stage: Recommendations for use based on acuity level of the patient: Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.įor detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit: Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (Vestibular EDGE) are listed below. More information on Version 2 can be found on the SF-36 website:.Version 2 norms are based on the 1998 National Survey of Functional Health Status (NSFHS).For each domain (physical and mental composite):.Each of the 8 summed scores is linearly transformed onto a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health) to provide a score for each subscale.Items within subscales are totaled to provide a summed score for each subscale or dimension.Recommended scoring system for the SF-36 is a weighted Likert system for each item.Respondents are asked to answer items referring to the past 4 weeks.36-item measure divided into 8 subscales and 2 composite domains.Ģ) Role Limitations due to Physical ProblemsĦ) Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |